Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H. Lawrence

book coverLady Chatterley’s Lover was first published in 1928 and though its author, D.H. Lawrence, was British, it was then published and distributed only in Italy and not in the United Kingdom.  When Penguin published the book in England thirty years later in 1960, they ended up going to trial, accused of violating the Obscene Publications Act of 1959.  A handful of witnesses, including E.M. Forester were called forth to attest to the book’s literary merit and in November of 1960 the jury reached a verdict of “not guilty.”

The story mostly concerns a woman named Connie (Lady Chatterley) who marries Clifford, an aristocratic man who becomes paralyzed and impotent due to injuries from fighting in the war. Connie has an affair with the gamekeeper, Oliver Mellors, and as their relationship deepens, she becomes more and more agitated by her superficial relationship with Clifford.

Early on in the novel, we encounter a number of discussions among Clifford and his associates about sex and male/female relationships.  They espouse their theories on women and love-making but particularly in the character of Tommy Dukes, Lawrence seems to be demonstrating that there isn’t much value in all that theorizing, as Tommy pays lip service to certain beliefs about love that he is incapable of putting into practice in real life.  These intellects talk openly about sex, but in reality it remains either meaningless or nonexistent.

Lawrence also explores the disparity between the classes in his novel, and his story demonstrates the effects of isolation, industrialization, and individualism.

Clifford Chatterley represents what Lawrence thought was wrong with the “modern” English nobleman.   He’s isolated, vain, and only concerned with his own self-interest and promotion, which he pursues through vacuous, but popular, writing and through industry.  He has no familial pride and no connection with the larger society. He is a man of himself, for himself, and to himself.  An individual.   In A Propos of Lady Chatterley’s Lover (which was appended to my Bantam Classics edition) Lawrence expounds,

“In the old England, the curious blood-connection held the classes together.  The squires might be arrogant, violent, bullying, and unjust, yet in some ways they were at one with the people, part of the same blood-stream.”

In contrast with the statement above, Lawrence describes the mindset of the new nobility as “the sharp knowing in apartness instead of knowing in togetherness.”  Clifford typifies this.  Lawrence himself says it best,

“All warmth is gone entirely, the hearth is cold, the heart does not humanly exist.  He is a pure product of our civilization, but he is the death of the great humanity of the world.  He is kind by rule but he does not know what warm sympathy means.”

Mellors (Lady Chatterley’s Lover – and gamekeeper) is Clifford’s opposite.  Working class, poor, passionate, sensual, and human.  At the beginning of the novel even Mellors risks slipping into isolation, but he has not completely lost that “togetherness,” which Lawrence believed hung on in the working classes after it disappeared from high society.  Mellors still retains the spark of humanity, which is present in his relationship with Connie.  He becomes learned and intelligent while retaining his human instinct – he represents sensuality without savagery.

I’m only a quarter of the way through Leaves of Grass so I certainly don’t intend to say this with any kind of authority, but Lawrence’s approach to sex in this novel feels very Whitmanian to me.  Very much like Whitman, Lawrence puts forth the idea that sex is just as much a part of life and what it means to be human as any of our other cerebral functions.  Also like Whitman, while speaking out against Puritanical ideas, Lawrence also cautions against licentiousness.  Balance is the key for both Whitman and Lawrence – a balance of the mind and body.

My only qualm with the novel is with the characters, which were very obviously mouthpieces for conveying Lawrence’s ideas.  Some of the dialogue and interactions felt a bit forced and unnatural.  In a previous post, I wholeheartedly defended Anne Bronte for her use of characters as blatant literary devices in Agnes Grey.  And I admit that I don’t have a really good justification for why I so readily defended Bronte but remain a twinge skeptical of Lawrence for doing very much the same thing.  But perhaps it’s because Lawrence’s ideas and method are so deeply human, personal, and intimate that I expected the characters to be more fully realized.  I didn’t feel as though I deeply knew them, which was odd since I was witnessing the most intimate aspects of their lives.

I am glad that I gave this novel time to simmer after I finished it.  I admit that the actual experience of reading it, for me, was just okay.  My appreciation for it heightened with a greater understanding of the author’s purpose.  I’m not sure if it’s included in every edition, but I highly recommend reading Lawrence’s own response to his novel, A Propos of Lady Chatterley’s Lover.  This essay does a lot to clarify Lawrence’s vision.  I’ll conclude with an excerpt from that:

“When the great crusade against sex and the body started in full blast with Plato, it was a crusade for ‘ideals,’ and for this ‘spiritual’ knowledge in apartness.  Sex is the great unifier. . . The idealist philosophies and religions set out deliberately to kill this. . . Now they have done it.  Now men are all separate little entities.  While ‘kindness’ is the glib order of the day – everybody must be ‘kind’ – underneath this ‘kindness’ we find a coldness of heart, a lack of heart, a callousness, that is very dreary.”

==========

Published: 1928 (Italy), 1959 (United States), 1960 (United Kingdom)

My Rating:  *** 3/5

==========

 

About these ads

7 thoughts on “Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H. Lawrence

  1. your review was wonderful!! Liked the quote as well. It has been a very long time since I have read the book, but now wish to read it again in the near future. thanks for your contribution.

  2. Loved reading your review. I had seen that you were currently reading it and was looking forward to hearing your points.

    Lady chatterley’s lover is my favourite classic! There’s a host of reasons why. I found myself getting involved with each of the characters. Feeling sympathy for their weaknesses and being so raptured when Connie and Mellors eventually fulfil the longing Connie discusses.
    I’m unfortunately not the best at details but I can say that Lady Chatterley’s Lover is one of those books that when I pick up every book since then I hope to finish it feeling the same if not better. This could be because I loved Lawrences ideas and his exploration of the classes or simply because of the trial I really wanted to like it.
    I do know that because of the hype surrounding this book due to the trial I had big expectations and was hoping that it gripped me. I found that it did. I enjoyed his writing and found him to be descriptive enough to know what he wanted to portray but also left room to ‘fill in the blanks’

    I realise that I haven’t been overly descriptive myself. Like I said details are not my forte! Its only recently since I’ve been looking at book blogs and thinking of starting one myself. Its teaching me to pinpoint the reasons why I love a book or not. With Lady Chatterley’s lover I suppose I’ll just have to read it again to be sure of my reasons why…darn!

  3. I found this abit of a slog to read but I was only about 18 when I did so that could be something to do with it. I liked the ideas and themes more than the actual characters or storyline.

  4. I love the book but, as you said, not the process of reading but the idea D.H Lawrence tried to convey. On of my favourite “grown-up” readings.

  5. @Marilyn: Thanks for visiting and commenting!

    @Heather: “one of those books that when I pick up every book since then I hope to finish it feeling the same if not better.” – I don’t know that I feel this way about LCL, but I totally understand the sentiment. That’s how I feel about Hardy. As for blogging, I definitely recommend it! I love being able to look back on what I thought about past books that I’ve read as well as connecting with other book bloggers. Let me know if you start one!

    @Jessica and @Elena: I agree – more than anything else, I appreciated the ideas that Lawrence was trying to communicate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s